From: David Luu (wicked01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat May 18 2002 - 20:38:13 GMT-3
use the promiscuous command on the local-peer of R2 and R3 since you do not
want remote-peer statements, also add the backup-peer option on R1...do the
previous mentioned on R3 and dlsw bridge-group in global config and
bridge-group on the ethernet interface, you could do without the
prom-peer-defaults, unless you want to change the values
you do not need to do border peers with this setup
At 04:09 PM 5/18/2002 -0700, Paul wrote:
>Hi Group,
>I ran into interesting problem, and I'm not sure if I
>have right solution. Three routers: R1, R2,R3
>connected
>by FR R1-R2 & R1-R3.R2 and R3 conneced by
>ethernet.Token ring on R1 and R2.Only remote peer
>statements are allowed on R1. R3 is used only as
>backup.R1 should be able to access TR and Ehernet on
>R2 if frame-relay R1-R2 brakes down.What do we need on
>R3?
>Only dlsw local peer prom + dlsw bridge group 1 ?
>I don't think it is enough. Maybe border + group
>statement on R1?
>What do you think gays?
>Paul
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:00 GMT-3