Re: RE: area 0 inactive - okay?

From: ca_vices (ca_vices@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri May 17 2002 - 16:27:26 GMT-3


   
Can you paste the configs on both your routers..??

Nevin

Sam.MicroGate@usa.telekom.de wrote:

Which command does produce the "area 0 inactive"?

Sam

-----Original Message-----
From: CCIE-Maillist [mailto:CCIE-Maillist@foxgal.com]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:59 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: area 0 inactive - okay?

Is it okay if a router says that OSPF area 0 is inactive as long as
everything is working?

I have a router in area 5, connected to a router with interfaces in area 0.
The adj. forms and is full. There are no errors on authenication. As the
router in area 5 is connected to a router with interfaces in area 0, it does
not need a virtual link (as I understand it).

When the router is in area 5, everything seems to work- routes from area 0
area on this router and it can communicate fine. The router in area 0 has
the routes from area 5 and even redistributed routers from the RIP network
connected to area 5. Everyone can communicate fine but the router in area 5
says that area 0 is inactive.

I tried moving the router in area 5 and changing the area to area 0,
everything worked fine and area 0 was active, using the same router ids, and
network statements (modified for area 0).

So, my question is- is it every okay for a router to say that "area 0 is
inactive"?

Thanks for the help!

David Davis



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:59:00 GMT-3