RE: Two Default Routes which path?

From: Kevin Mitnick (kevin_ross46@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 16 2002 - 01:57:43 GMT-3

• Next message: kevin mitnick: "RE: Two Default Routes which path?"
• Previous message: Hansang Bae: "RE: Two Default Routes which path?"
• Maybe in reply to: Giveortake@xxxxxxx: "Two Default Routes which path?"
• Next in thread: kevin mitnick: "RE: Two Default Routes which path?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hansang,

Thanks for clearing that up. I mixed up candidate default with BGP best
path decision!

Kevin

 --- Hansang Bae <hbae@nyc.rr.com> wrote: > At 05:35 AM 5/16/2002
+0100, kevin mitnick wrote:
> >I thought so too but I noticed a * next to the first route to
> serial0.2
> >* = candidate default.
> >If the two paths are load balancing, there shouldn't be a * right?
> >
> >> >O*E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 165.21.200.9, 00:01:36,Serial0.2
> >> > [110/1] via 165.21.200.14, 00:01:37,Serial0.3
>
>
> Why shouldn't there be a "*" ? You have two candidate default
> routes. It's just that the display will show equal cost routes on
> top of each other.
>
> hsb

• Next message: kevin mitnick: "RE: Two Default Routes which path?"
• Previous message: Hansang Bae: "RE: Two Default Routes which path?"
• Maybe in reply to: Giveortake@xxxxxxx: "Two Default Routes which path?"
• Next in thread: kevin mitnick: "RE: Two Default Routes which path?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:58 GMT-3