From: Hansang Bae (hbae@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 16 2002 - 01:44:46 GMT-3
At 05:35 AM 5/16/2002 +0100, kevin mitnick wrote:
>I thought so too but I noticed a * next to the first route to serial0.2
>* = candidate default.
>If the two paths are load balancing, there shouldn't be a * right?
>
>> >O*E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 165.21.200.9, 00:01:36,Serial0.2
>> > [110/1] via 165.21.200.14, 00:01:37,Serial0.3
Why shouldn't there be a "*" ? You have two candidate default routes. It's ju
st that the display will show equal cost routes on top of each other.
hsb
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:58 GMT-3