From: David Luu (wicked01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 16 2002 - 01:08:58 GMT-3
i believe you are load balancing on a per destination basis and its making
it look like only 1 is being used, which is true...do a "no ip route-cache"
At 04:49 AM 5/16/2002 +0100, kevin mitnick wrote:
>Hansang,
>
>Even with the maximim-path set , I still get two
>routes to default with only one prefered. Here is a
>"show ip route" I captured from rouer A
>Gateway of last resort is 165.21.200.9 to network
>0.0.0.0
>
> 172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>C 172.16.6.0 is directly connected, Loopback1
>C 192.168.50.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> 165.21.0.0/30 is subnetted, 4 subnets
>C 165.21.200.8 is directly connected, Serial0.2
>C 165.21.200.12 is directly connected, Serial0.3
>O 165.21.200.0 [110/128] via 165.21.200.14,
>00:01:36, Serial0.3
>O 165.21.200.4 [110/128] via 165.21.200.9,
>00:01:36, Serial0.2
>O*E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 165.21.200.9, 00:01:36,
>Serial0.2
> [110/1] via 165.21.200.14, 00:01:37,
>Serial0.3
>
> --- Hansang Bae <hbae@nyc.rr.com> wrote: > At 02:39
>AM 5/16/2002 +0100, kevin mitnick wrote:
> > >I have tested this scenario with 4 OSPF routers
> > linked
> > >in a ring topology.
> > >
> > >A--B--C--D (D connected to A)
> > >
> > >Router B and D originate default.
> > >
> > >I configured two routers B and C to orignate
> > default
> > >with equal cost. The other two routers who recieve
> > the
> > >LSA's from the default originating routers will
> > only
> > >choose one best default path although their routing
> > >table indicates an alternaive parth. There is
> > somthing
> > >special about how default routes are treated. I
> > have
> > >yet to put my finger on it.
> >
> >
> > If you want OSPF to choose multiple equal cost
> > routes, you need "maximum-path blah" under ROUTER
> > OSPF PID.
> >
> > Are you sure your defaults are *both* in the routing
> > table?
> >
> > hsb
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:58 GMT-3