Catalyst 2600 instead of 3920

From: Vincent Tsang (cvst@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 14 2002 - 23:33:47 GMT-3

• Next message: Giveortake@xxxxxxx: "Re: Impression on ISDN additional question"
• Previous message: Jeongwoo Park: "Impression on ISDN"
• Next in thread: elpingu: "Re: Catalyst 2600 instead of 3920"
• Maybe reply: elpingu: "Re: Catalyst 2600 instead of 3920"
• Maybe reply: Jonathan Hays: "RE: Catalyst 2600 instead of 3920"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hello all,

I am sure this has been mentioned before, but I couldn't find anything in
the archive.

Is it possible to use a 2600 instead of a 3920 for token ring study
purposes? I went through the documentation, and the menu interface is
similar but different, I've also checked that they do use different
firmware.

Thank you.

Vincent Tsang

• Next message: Giveortake@xxxxxxx: "Re: Impression on ISDN additional question"
• Previous message: Jeongwoo Park: "Impression on ISDN"
• Next in thread: elpingu: "Re: Catalyst 2600 instead of 3920"
• Maybe reply: elpingu: "Re: Catalyst 2600 instead of 3920"
• Maybe reply: Jonathan Hays: "RE: Catalyst 2600 instead of 3920"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:56 GMT-3