RE: Just for a confirmation !! on redistribution

From: ying chang (ying_c@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 12 2002 - 14:14:23 GMT-3


   
I agree. When I do mutual redistribution, I always tag different protocols
with different tags first, check which routes get into ospf database by
"show ip ospf database | begin -5", and create route-map from there. Permit
routes going from the edge into the core, and deny them when they going back
to the edge. I also use "debug ip routing" at the resitribution router, the
command can help to catch route feedback early on.

>From: "Emmanuel Oppong" <e-oppong@attbi.com>
>Reply-To: "Emmanuel Oppong" <e-oppong@attbi.com>
>To: "Ahmed Mamoor Amimi" <mamoor@ieee.org>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: Just for a confirmation !! on redistribution
>Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 09:34:26 -0700
>
>Should work fine, I think. But I would also "tag" any protocols (including
>connected routes) redistributed into OSPF. This way if any route is
>sneeking back into ospf you can tell using "show ip ospf database" and then
>filter it out.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Ahmed Mamoor Amimi
>Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 2:27 AM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Just for a confirmation !! on redistribution
>
>
>Morning Guys !!
>Is my way of redistribution correct please confirmed after reading this :
>
>r1------(eigrp)-------r2------(ospf)-------r3
>
>r1 running eigrp
>r2 running eigrp and ospf
>r3 running ospf
>
>r1 have routes 1,2,3
>r3 have routes 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 (lots of routes)
>
>on r2 i will redistribute and be specific that no route loop is formed so i
>use route-map in redistribution.
>
>i made a route-map on r2 which only calls eigrp routes
>route-map eigrp
> match ip address 1
>
>access-list 1 permit 1
>access-list 1 permit 2
>access-list 1 permit 3
>
>for ospf i dont make access-list but instead i denied 1,2,3 and allow
>others
>,
>like :
>route-map ospf deny 10
> match ip address 1
>
>route-map ospf permit 20
>
>ospf route-map is calling that same access-list that is made for eigrp but
>here this access-list is denied and rest are permitted.
>
>
>Is this the correct way or i should make an access-list for ospf and call
>4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 (takes lot of time) and apply it to the ospf
>route-map.
>
>Just want to make sure .....
>
>waiting for comments.
>
>-Mamoor



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:55 GMT-3