From: David Luu (wicked01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun May 12 2002 - 16:13:55 GMT-3
instead of denying or permitting each route, why not just use route tags?
route-map eigrp2ospf deny 10
match tag 22
route-map eigrp2ospf permit 20
set tag 11
route-map ospf2eigrp deny 10
match tag 11
route-map osof2eigrp permit 20
set tag 22
At 02:26 PM 5/12/2002 +0500, Ahmed Mamoor Amimi wrote:
>Morning Guys !!
>Is my way of redistribution correct please confirmed after reading this :
>
>r1------(eigrp)-------r2------(ospf)-------r3
>
>r1 running eigrp
>r2 running eigrp and ospf
>r3 running ospf
>
>r1 have routes 1,2,3
>r3 have routes 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 (lots of routes)
>
>on r2 i will redistribute and be specific that no route loop is formed so i
>use route-map in redistribution.
>
>i made a route-map on r2 which only calls eigrp routes
>route-map eigrp
> match ip address 1
>
>access-list 1 permit 1
>access-list 1 permit 2
>access-list 1 permit 3
>
>for ospf i dont make access-list but instead i denied 1,2,3 and allow others ,
>like :
>route-map ospf deny 10
> match ip address 1
>
>route-map ospf permit 20
>
>ospf route-map is calling that same access-list that is made for eigrp but
>here this access-list is denied and rest are permitted.
>
>
>Is this the correct way or i should make an access-list for ospf and call
>4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 (takes lot of time) and apply it to the ospf
>route-map.
>
>Just want to make sure .....
>
>waiting for comments.
>
>-Mamoor
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:55 GMT-3