From: ying chang (ying_c@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed May 08 2002 - 00:02:09 GMT-3
Hi Steve,
I have to say the word "only" is misleading. As far as I can tell from my
setup of NetBIOS and SNA circuits, you cannot seperate SNA traffic from
NetBIOS traffic until you have priority keyword in the dlsw remote
statement. This also made me to beleive that unless dlsw remote priority is
used, there's no sense to setup access-list for port 1981-1983, why bother
when they are not there?
Now do I know for sure dlsw keyword is equvalent to port 2065? I'm not sure.
To play safe, unless I'm forced to use the dlsw keyword, I think I'll stick
with port numbers for now.
Thanks,
Chang
>From: steven.j.nelson@bt.com
>To: ying_c@hotmail.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
>CC: stephen.paynter@bt.com
>Subject: RE: DLSW Custom Queuing.
>Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 18:25:52 +0100
>
>Chang Et al,
>
>I have found the relevant document on CCO, the URL is :-
>
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/dlsw5_rg.htm
>
>Interestingly enough it states that ports 2065 is also only used when
>prioritisation is required.
>
>Thanks
>
>Steve
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ying chang [mailto:ying_c@hotmail.com]
>Sent: 07 May 2002 17:14
>To: Nelson,SJ,Steven,IVNH25 C; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: DLSW Custom Queuing.
>
>
>Hi Steve,
>
>I also have the same question. Have you verified it can only send SNA
>traffic already? If you haven't, I would say setup two PCs and see if
>NetBIOS traffic can pass thru the pipe would be a quick way to verify this
>behavior. After you finish this, you can use dspu to see if there's any SNA
>circuits. I'm not working on DLSW right now, but please keep me posted,
>because I'd like to know the answer too.
>
>Thanks,
>Chang
>
>
> >From: steven.j.nelson@bt.com
> >Reply-To: steven.j.nelson@bt.com
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: DLSW Custom Queuing.
> >Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 16:20:26 +0100
> >
> >All
> >
> >I have noted and tested the scenarios using custom queuing to restrict
> >bandwidth on an interface based on packet sizes, and I have used as
> >mentioned in this list the access list for DLSw ports instead of the DLSw
> >keyword in the queuing argument.
> >
> >I was wondering does anyone have a URL that outlines the behaviour of
> >custom
> >queuing when using DLSw keyword.
> >
> >i.e That this keyword permits SNA traffic only and not all DLSw traffic,
>I
> >have searched CCO but cannot find any reference to it.
> >
> >Thanks in advance
> >
> >Steve
> >
> >Steve Nelson
> >Customer Engineer
> >BT Ignite- National Solutions
> >T: +44 (0)1422 338881 M: +44 (0)7811 944172
> >e-mail: steven.j.nelson@bt.com
> >pp HW A170, PO Box 200(HOM-NZ), London, N18 1ZF
> > > British Telecommunications plc
> > > Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ
> > > Registered in England no. 1800000.
> > > This electronic message contains information from British
> >Telecommunications plc which may be privileged or confidential. The
> >information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity
> >named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any
> >disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> >information
> >is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error,
> >please
> >notify us by telephone or email (to the numbers or address above)
> >immediately.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:52 GMT-3