Re: Failure Notice

From: Paul (paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue May 07 2002 - 14:27:27 GMT-3


   
Done!

Paul

On Fri, 3 May 2002, Nick Shah wrote:

> I too get his msg. Paul, can you pl. remove (or suspend) this guy for the
> time being...
>
> Thanks
> Nick
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis <cc13@attbi.com>
> To: Paul Borghese <paul@groupstudy.com>; CCIE Groupstudy
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Date: Friday, 3 May 2002 4:35
> Subject: FW: Failure Notice
>
>
> >Every time I post to the list in the past few weeks I get this message.
> Has
> >anyone else got this? Can someone please remove this person from the list
> >since they obviously don't care about reading messages from it?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Dennis
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: MAILER-DAEMON@ecplaza.net [mailto:MAILER-DAEMON@ecplaza.net]
> >Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:21 PM
> >To: cc13@attbi.com
> >Subject: Failure Notice
> >
> >
> >Receiver:dsteadman@ecplaza.net
> >Your mail exceeded the recipient quota
> >Reply-To: "Dennis" <cc13@attbi.com>
> >From: "Dennis" <cc13@attbi.com>
> >Sender: <nobody@groupstudy.com>
> >To: "CCIE Groupstudy" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: RE: BGP tables increasing significantly
> >Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 11:33:07 -0400
> >Message-ID: <CIEHKLPAODCFHLPFFOINGEDFCOAA.cc13@attbi.com>
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
> >X-ASK-Info: Our key was found in the mail
> >In-Reply-To: <51592BEAAEE8D411A24400508B693A4E011BA4C3@vip.10-1-2.062.ip
> > . eurekadns.net>
> >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
> >
> >Don't you follow the list??? This was pounded into the ground yesterday
> >complete with everyone posting their bgp numbers!
> >
> >Dennis
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> >Lupi, Guy
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:05 AM
> >To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> >Subject: BGP tables increasing significantly
> >
> >
> >Has anyone else noticed that their bgp prefixes received from their
> >providers has gone up by about 3 to 4 thousand routes in the last week or
> >so? Is there an "issue" somewhere on the net? Or is this something that
> >happens periodically and I am just now noticing it?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:52 GMT-3