From: Nick Shah (nshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 02 2002 - 20:12:01 GMT-3
I too get his msg. Paul, can you pl. remove (or suspend) this guy for the
time being...
Thanks
Nick
-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis <cc13@attbi.com>
To: Paul Borghese <paul@groupstudy.com>; CCIE Groupstudy
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: Friday, 3 May 2002 4:35
Subject: FW: Failure Notice
>Every time I post to the list in the past few weeks I get this message.
Has
>anyone else got this? Can someone please remove this person from the list
>since they obviously don't care about reading messages from it?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Dennis
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: MAILER-DAEMON@ecplaza.net [mailto:MAILER-DAEMON@ecplaza.net]
>Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:21 PM
>To: cc13@attbi.com
>Subject: Failure Notice
>
>
>Receiver:dsteadman@ecplaza.net
>Your mail exceeded the recipient quota
>Reply-To: "Dennis" <cc13@attbi.com>
>From: "Dennis" <cc13@attbi.com>
>Sender: <nobody@groupstudy.com>
>To: "CCIE Groupstudy" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: BGP tables increasing significantly
>Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 11:33:07 -0400
>Message-ID: <CIEHKLPAODCFHLPFFOINGEDFCOAA.cc13@attbi.com>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
>X-ASK-Info: Our key was found in the mail
>In-Reply-To: <51592BEAAEE8D411A24400508B693A4E011BA4C3@vip.10-1-2.062.ip
> . eurekadns.net>
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
>
>Don't you follow the list??? This was pounded into the ground yesterday
>complete with everyone posting their bgp numbers!
>
>Dennis
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Lupi, Guy
>Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:05 AM
>To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>Subject: BGP tables increasing significantly
>
>
>Has anyone else noticed that their bgp prefixes received from their
>providers has gone up by about 3 to 4 thousand routes in the last week or
>so? Is there an "issue" somewhere on the net? Or is this something that
>happens periodically and I am just now noticing it?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:49 GMT-3