From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon May 06 2002 - 08:21:15 GMT-3
Hi,
Q2: what about throughput ? If expected frames are short, you save 20
bytes
per frame using FST, so there may be a difference.
Also, you get end to end acks (TCP does local acks / keepalive spoofing)
and that can be a difference in some scenario (?).
Nick Shah wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> 2 Q;s on DLSW ..
>
> On the CCO it says that :
>
> With TCP encapsulation, you can take advantage of DDR to dynamically dial
> additional bandwidth if the primary link reaches a preconfigured amount of
> congestion
>
> Has anyone have experimented with it, I am specifically interested in
> knowing how you could configure BOD using DLSW & DDR.
>
> The other Q is : Is there any feature in FST/DIRECT encap. that is *not*
> provided by TCP, meaning (unless explicitly asked to use particular encap)
> is there something that can be done by other encap. , that cannot be done by
> TCP.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Nick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:51 GMT-3