From: Harish DV/peakxv (harish.dv@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 02 2002 - 22:13:09 GMT-3
ebgp multihop is for ebgp only, not ibgp.
Harish
"Michael Jia"
<mjia@cisco.com> To: "peter brown" <pita40@
hotmail.com>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent by: cc:
nobody@groupstudy Subject: RE: BGP update-source
.com
05/02/2002 05:23
PM
Please respond to
"Michael Jia"
Use ebgp multi-hop in neighbor statement.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> peter brown
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:01 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: BGP update-source
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I notice that when I use nei x.x.x.x update-source lo0 on both
> side of ibgp
> nei that are directly connected they loose tcp connection with
> each other.
> When I remove update-source statement from one nei and use the
> physical int.
> they are able to establish tcp connection. Why is this the case. Are you
> only suppose to use it only on side between two nei. Below is the
config.
>
> Router A
> interface Loopback0
> ip address 40.40.40.4 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
>
> interface Serial0
> ip address 10.1.1.4 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
>
> router bgp 50
> neighbor 10.1.1.1 remote-as 50
> neighbor 10.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0
> no auto-summary
>
>
> Router Binterface Loopback0
> ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
>
> interface Serial0
> ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> no ip directed-broadcast
>
> router bgp 50
> neighbor 10.1.1.4 remote-as 50
> neighbor 10.1.1.4 update-source Loopback0
> no auto-summary
> no ip mroute-cache
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:49 GMT-3