From: Peter van Oene (pvo@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu May 02 2002 - 15:15:57 GMT-3
Most of this stuff occurred following the IS-IS meltdown and I'm not
altogether sure the two aren't related in some way. I imagine there was a
bunch of rapid configuration and maintenance performed around that time
that might not be fully up to spec just yet.
At 12:42 PM 5/2/2002 -0400, Scott Morris wrote:
>Hehehe... Cool. AS 705 is UUNet. They must have laid off all their
>BGP techies.
>
>Scott
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Howard C. Berkowitz
>Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:24 PM
>To: CCIE Groupstudy
>Subject: RE: BGP tables increasing significantly
>
>A little more information from the NANOG list that might help people
>protect their BGP routers. The excess routes all seem to be coming
>from AS 705. You might want to put in an AS path filter blocking
>everything from there, and open it up only if users report
>connectivity problems.
>
>
>At 11:33 AM -0400 5/2/02, Dennis wrote:
> >Don't you follow the list??? This was pounded into the ground
>yesterday
> >complete with everyone posting their bgp numbers!
> >
> >Dennis
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> >Lupi, Guy
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:05 AM
> >To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> >Subject: BGP tables increasing significantly
> >
> >
> >Has anyone else noticed that their bgp prefixes received from their
> >providers has gone up by about 3 to 4 thousand routes in the last week
>or
> >so? Is there an "issue" somewhere on the net? Or is this something
>that
> >happens periodically and I am just now noticing it?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:49 GMT-3