From: ying chang (ying_c@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 29 2002 - 10:54:16 GMT-3
The first 2 is token ring bridge number, the second 2 is ethernet bridge
number.
>From: "yakout esmat" <yesmat@iprimus.com.au>
>Reply-To: "yakout esmat" <yesmat@iprimus.com.au>
>To: "Sonja Koestler" <skoestle@cisco.com>, "'Groupstudy'"
><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: RSRB/TL configs
>Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 23:37:07 +1000
>
>I have read this before I sent my email of course.
>Sometimes I think that CCO documentation is purposely written to confuse us
>all.
>
>Anyways, my question still stands in the following example (which is cut
>and
>paste from the link that you have just sent me)
>
>
>Examples
>
>The following example establishes bridging between a transparent-bridge
>network and a source-route network:
>
>source-bridge ring-group 9
>source-bridge transparent 9 6 2 2
>!
>interface tokenring 0
> source-bridge 5 2 9
>!
>interface token ring 1
>source bridge 4 2 9
>!
>interface ethernet 0
>bridge-group 2
>!
>interface ethernet 1
>bridge-group 2
>
>bridge 2 protocol ieee
>
>That all fine but
>
>'source-bridge transparent 9 6 2 2' which one is the first (2) is that the
>token ring bridge-number or Ethernet bridge-number.
>
>In the example (intensionally for confusion sake) both are the same.
>
>
>Ya
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Sonja Koestler
>Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:52 PM
>To: 'yakout esmat'; 'Groupstudy'
>Subject: RE: RSRB/TL configs
>
>
>sometimes the command reference is more useful than the samples. look at
>this:
>
>http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ibm_
>r/brprt1/br1dsrb.htm#xtocid112178
>
>hth, sonja
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>yakout esmat
>Sent: Montag, 29. April 2002 13:58
>To: Groupstudy
>Subject: RSRB/TL configs
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>I have an issue here in regards to 'Source-bridge transparent...' command.
>
>If we have the following configs on a router:
>
>source-bridge ring-group 100
>source-bridge transparent 100 1000 ? ?
>!
>interface ethernet 0
> ip add 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> bridge-group 2
>!
>interface tokenring 1
> ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
> source-bridge 5 1 100
> source-bridge spanning
>!
>end
>
>If we need to bridge (Translational) between Ethernet and Token ring
>interafces on the same router, we will need to use the following command:
>
>'source-bridge trasparent 100 1000 <?> <?>'
>
>100 = virtual ring number (Token ring)
>1000= pseudo ring number
><?>= Does this number equals the ehternet bridge-groupe number in this case
>(2) ???
><?>= Does this numnber equals the token ring bridge number in this case (1)
>???
>
>All the examples I have seen at CCO are confusing because they are using
>the
>same number.
>
>Thanks in advance
>
>Ya
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:22 GMT-3