From: Larson, Chris (Contractor) (Chris.Larson@xxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 29 2002 - 10:23:11 GMT-3
The only number numkbers that really matter here are the first and fourth
numbers. The 2 in between are logical. The first number should be the
ring-group as you have it, the last number should be the bridge group. The
second and third numbers are logical and it does not really matter what you
use.
-----Original Message-----
From: yakout esmat [mailto:yesmat@iprimus.com.au]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:58 AM
To: Groupstudy
Subject: RSRB/TL configs
Hi all,
I have an issue here in regards to 'Source-bridge transparent...' command.
If we have the following configs on a router:
source-bridge ring-group 100
source-bridge transparent 100 1000 ? ?
!
interface ethernet 0
ip add 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
bridge-group 2
!
interface tokenring 1
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
source-bridge 5 1 100
source-bridge spanning
!
end
If we need to bridge (Translational) between Ethernet and Token ring
interafces on the same router, we will need to use the following command:
'source-bridge trasparent 100 1000 <?> <?>'
100 = virtual ring number (Token ring)
1000= pseudo ring number
<?>= Does this number equals the ehternet bridge-groupe number in this case
(2) ???
<?>= Does this numnber equals the token ring bridge number in this case (1)
???
All the examples I have seen at CCO are confusing because they are using the
same number.
Thanks in advance
Ya
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:22 GMT-3