RE: IPXWAN unnumbered and EIGRP

From: George Spahl (g.spahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Apr 27 2002 - 17:51:58 GMT-3


   
Curtis,
I'm also unable to make IPXWAN work with IPX EIGRP. I've tried it with
IPX EIGRP configured on both sides of a point-to-point (HDLC) link and
IPX RIP turned off on both sides. I've also tried numbered and
unnumbered on the IPXWAN.
Whenever I bring up the link and watch the debug it looks like IPXWAN
negotiates RIP for the link and then when I look at the routers I see
that there have been RIP routes exchanged across the link. This even
though I had issued a "no ipx router rip" prior to bringing up the
IPXWAN link. I previously thought that IPXWAN supported EIGRP, but I
guess that isn't the case. It seems that IPXWAN supports only NLSP and
IPX RIP (in that order of preference)and not EIGRP. Has anyone seen
this work differently?
George

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Erhan Kurt
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:34 AM
To: Curtis Phillips; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IPXWAN unnumbered and EIGRP

Use network internal network in EIGRP
No net in RIP

Erhan

-----Original Message-----
From: Curtis Phillips [mailto:cphillips@blazenet.net]
Sent: 26 Nisan 2002 Cuma 15:48
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPXWAN unnumbered and EIGRP

Hello All,

Is nay one aware of how to configure IPX EIGRP over an unnumbered
interface
with IPXWAN enabled.
It appears that RIP successfully is negotiated by default(When isn't
it:-) )
But I am having difficulty getting RIP shut down over the link and EIGRP
working.

How is rip disabled without network number?
How is EIGRP enabled without network number?

Thanks in advance,

Curtis



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:20 GMT-3