From: Mas Kato (loomis_towcar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Apr 27 2002 - 16:43:16 GMT-3
[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text]
Policy routing can be completely arbitrary. Policy routing using 'set interface
' in your route-map completely disregards the routing table. But return traffic
of course will be subject to the local policy at the destination.
Regards,
Mas Kato
https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> "Ludwig Morales" <lud.morales@codetel.net.do> <ccielab@groupstudy.com> OSPF D
EMAND CIRCUITDate: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:47:38 -0400
>Reply-To: "Ludwig Morales" <lud.morales@codetel.net.do>
>
>Pie ChartsHi
>
>I been working with ip ospf demand circuit and everything is working as it
>should be, but I'm wandering is there another way to route packets destined
>to the remote BRI interface (ping the remote 172.16.2.0 interface) trough
>the primary link, I was thinking policy routing or something but the fact
>that this is a directly connected interface with the lowest AD almost have
>me convinced it can't be done. but you guys always find a way out of stuff
>like this, anyone?
>
>Caller#sh ip ro
>
> 2.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>C 2.2.2.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
> 172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets
>C 172.16.2.0 is directly connected, BRI0
>C 172.16.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0.1
> 15.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
>O 15.15.15.1 [110/65] via 172.16.1.2, 00:04:13, Serial0.1
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:20 GMT-3