From: Eric Lemmons (ericlemmons@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Apr 26 2002 - 19:02:06 GMT-3
Statics are explicitly not permitted, unless the question itself says
you can create one.
Eric
--- David Luu <wicked01@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> create secondary addresses on igrp with the /29 mask and tunnel it
> to
> ospf's /29...
>
> btw, i use statics and sometimes defaults for my tunnels (following
> cisco's
> examples on tunnels)...does anyone know if this is acceptable on
> the lab?
> since technically it does violate the no static rule...is there
> anyone that
> has an example of a tunnel without using them?
>
>
> At 10:26 AM 4/26/2002 -0700, Jaspreet Bhatia wrote:
> >Gentlemen,
> > I kinda know how to redistribute
> between OSPF
> > and IGRP when IGRP has a smaller mask say /24 than OSPF say /29 .
> The way
> > to do this is to make a loopback interface with the same major
> net as
> > OSPF with a /24 mask and redistribute connected into IGRP using
> the
> > connected statement and a route-map for carefully controlling
> route
> > redistribution into IGRP . This works like a charm .....
> >
> >
> >Now here is my problem ........
> >
> >
> > How do I redistribute OSPF into IGRP when IGRP mask is /30 and
> OSPF
> > mask is /29 that is IGRP has a longer mask than OSPF . There is
> a way
> > suggested on CCO ( although it is against the most basic lab rule
> -- NO
> > STATIC ROUTES ) . The CCO doc says that I can make a static route
> with
> > mask of /30 ( ingress interface of IGRP ) and point it to
> either the
> > next hop on the OSPF network or an interface leading to that
> subnet on
> > the OSPF network . I tried this and this is leading to routes
> with
> > inaccessible metric going into the IGRP domain . NOT GOOD .
> Anyone can
> > help me out of this problem ..... . Also I have secondary
> interfaces
> > with Split horizon turned off on teh IGRP side .....
> >
> >
> >Help Help Please .....
> >
> >Jaspreet
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:20 GMT-3