From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi (mamoor@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 24 2002 - 15:02:04 GMT-3
Thanks for that clearification !!
Can u point me to some example at CCO for this topic ....
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Bratchell <a.bratchell@caeuk.com>
To: 'Ahmed Mamoor Amimi' <mamoor@ieee.org>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:46 PM
Subject: RE: DLSW priority
> Mamoor,
>
> Yes, priority needs to be defined on both R1 and R2.
>
> Andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi [mailto:mamoor@ieee.org]
> Sent: 24 April 2002 18:47
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: DLSW priority
>
> quick question !!
>
> dlsw peers : r1-------r2
>
> If i and opening the 3 more famous ports on r1 of dlsw (1981,1982,1983) by
> giving the command "dlsw blah blah blah priority " and giving the normal
> priority that is port 1982 for SNA traffic. Should i have to give the
"dlsw
> blah blah blah priority " command on r2 so it can understand those port or
> it
> will normally picks up the SNA trafiic. As in normal condition all the
data
> traffic and signalling is done through 2065 port.
>
>
> -Mamoor
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:18 GMT-3