From: steven owen (trueccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Apr 23 2002 - 13:07:28 GMT-3
I configured FST remote peer at each end,
but the dlsw circuit couldn't be built.
and it shows "TCP peer lf too low",cause i use FST
encapsulation ,why it relates with TCP.
so i corrected the config,
"dlsw remote-peer 0 fst 4.4.4.4 lf 17800".17800
is the maximum,i don't know the default .
The result seems better ,i can find the NETBIOS NAME
,but i couldn't see the content in the shared
directory,the dlsw circuit couldn't be built either.
Thanks.
01:16:34: DLSW Received-ctlQ : CLSI Msg :
UDATA_STN.Ind dlen: 79
01:16:34: CSM: Received CLSI Msg : UDATA_STN.Ind
dlen: 79 from DLSw Port0
01:16:34: CSM: smac 0000.6152.b924, dmac
c000.0000.0080, ssap F0, dsap F0
01:16:34: CSM: Received frame type NETBIOS NAME_QUERY
from 0000.6152.b924, DL0
01:16:34: %DLSWC-3-RECVSSP: SSP OP = 19( NBNR )
-explorer from peer 4.4.4.4(0)
01:16:34: DISP Sent : CLSI Msg : UDATA_STN.Req
dlen: 90
01:16:34: DLSW Received-ctlQ : CLSI Msg :
UDATA_STN.Ind dlen: 79
01:16:34: CSM: Received CLSI Msg : UDATA_STN.Ind
dlen: 79 from DLSw Port0
01:16:34: CSM: smac 0000.6152.b924, dmac
000b.1fb0.3ac3, ssap F0, dsap F0
01:16:34: CSM: Received frame type NETBIOS NAME_QUERY
from 0000.6152.b924, DL0
01:16:34: %DLSWC-3-RECVSSP: SSP OP = 19( NBNR )
-explorer from peer 4.4.4.4(0)
01:16:34: DISP Sent : CLSI Msg : UDATA_STN.Req
dlen: 90
01:16:34: DLSW Received-ctlQ : CLSI Msg :
CONECT_STN.Ind dlen: 47
01:16:34: CSM: Received CLSI Msg : CONECT_STN.Ind
dlen: 47 from DLSw Port0
01:16:34: CSM: smac 0000.6152.b924, dmac
000b.1fb0.3ac3, ssap F0, dsap F0
01:16:34: %DLSWC-3-RECVSSP: SSP OP = 4( ICR )
-explorer from peer 4.4.4.4(0)
01:16:34: DLSW Received-ctlQ : CLSI Msg :
CONECT_STN.Ind dlen: 47
01:16:34: CSM: Received CLSI Msg : CONECT_STN.Ind
dlen: 47 from DLSw Port0
01:16:34: CSM: smac 0000.6152.b924, dmac
000b.1fb0.3ac3, ssap F0, dsap F0CSM: new_conn
from DLSw Port0 to peer 4.4.4.4(0) blocked. TCP peer
lf too low.
01:16:34: CSM: send cur_ex to get the correct mtu size
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:17 GMT-3