From: Tim O'Brien (tobrien@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Apr 23 2002 - 12:05:07 GMT-3
nope, the whole EIGRP process is based upon the network statement being in
there. I am actually kinda surprised that you even got it to show up in the
config without a network statement. Try to write out the config and reload
the router and see if it stays in there without the network statement.
Tim
CCIE 9015
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Alex Paulino
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:28 AM
To: Jason Gardiner; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Eigrp Unicast over NBMA
Thanks Mr Jason, so the configuration is too like the ospf unicast. Does
exist some way to configure eigrp unicast without to use the network command
under eigrp process?
thanks again,
alex
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Gardiner [mailto:gardiner@sprint.net]
Sent: Tue 4/23/2002 11:05 AM
To: Alex Paulino
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Eigrp Unicast over NBMA
Your problem now is that you don't have a network statement under EIGRP
process, so no interfaces are participating.
Add network 138.1.13.0 to both and you should be fine.
On Tuesday 23 April 2002 10:03, Alex Paulino wrote:
> Hi Jason, so i must to have two frame-relay map into each serial
interface?
> and, the neighbor command under eigrp process, must to match with the
> remote IP address?
> I dont't know what is wrong in my configuration, cause when i start t
he
> eigrp debug, nothing appears in my screen.
> Why when i type "show run" the eigrp process doesn't appear ?
>
> Follow my actual configuration:
>
> R1)
> !
> interface Serial1
> ip address 138.1.13.1 255.255.255.252
> encapsulation frame-relay
> cdp enable
> frame-relay map ip 138.1.13.1 113 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 138.1.13.2 113 broadcast
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> end
> !
> router eigrp 50
> no auto-summary
> neighbor 138.1.13.2 serial 1
>
> R3)
> interface Serial1/4
> ip address 138.1.13.2 255.255.255.252
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay map ip 138.1.13.1 706 broadcast
> frame-relay map ip 138.1.13.2 706 broadcast
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> end
> !
> router eigrp 50
> no auto-summary
> neighbor 138.1.13.1 serial 1/4
> !
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gardiner [mailto:gardiner@sprint.net]
> Sent: Tue 4/23/2002 10:12 AM
> To: Alex Paulino
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Eigrp Unicast over NBMA
>
>
>
> No. You have no mapping to the remote IP address, only the loc
al.
You
> would
also need
>
> frame-relay map ip 155.10.123.1 102 broadcast
>
> on router 1
>
> and
>
> frame-relay map ip 155.10.123.2 102 broadcast
>
> on router 2.
>
>
> On Monday 22 April 2002 22:24, Alex Paulino wrote:
>
> > Hi there.
> >
> > It means that if I configure 2 routers like the following I
should have
> > adjacencies?
>
>
>
> > Router 1
> > !
> > interface serial 2/0
> > ip add 155.10.123.1 255.255.255.0
> > encap frame-relay
> > frame-relay map ip 155.10.123.2 102 broadcast
> > !
> > router eigrp 12
> > neighbor 155.10.123.1 serial 2/0
> > !
> >
> > Router 2
> > !
> > interface serial 2/0
> > ip add 155.10.123.1 255.255.255.0
> > encap frame-relay
> > frame-relay map ip 155.10.123.1 201 broadcast
> > !
> > router eigrp 12
> > neighbor 155.10.123.2 serial 2/0
> > !
> >
> > Are those basic configs ok or did I miss anything?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Gardiner [mailto:gardiner@sprint.net]
> > Sent: Mon 4/22/2002 10:58 PM
> > To: Alex Paulino
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Eigrp Unicast over NBMA
> >
> >
> >
> > Okay, I tried this and this is what I found:
> >
> > Side 1 does not have a paasive interface or a neighbor.
Debug
> > shows
EIGRP
>
> as multicasts:
>
> >
> > 2d00h: IP: s=155.100.15.1 (Ethernet0/0), d=224.0.0.10,
len
60,
> > rcvd 2
2d00h: IP: s=155.100.15.5 (local), d=224.0.0.10 (Ethernet0/0),
> > len 60, sending broad/multicast
> > 2d00h: IP: s=155.100.56.5 (local), d=224.0.0.10
(Serial1/0), len
> > 60,
sending bro
> >
> >
> > Side 2 has a neighbor statement but does not have a pas
sive
> > interface:
> > 10w1d: IP: s=155.100.6.6 (local), d=224.0.0.10 (Loopbac
k0),
len
> > 60,
sending broad/multicast
> > 10w1d: IP: s=155.100.6.6 (Loopback0), d=224.0.0.10, len
60,
rcvd
> > 2
10w1d: IP: s=155.100.56.6 (local), d=155.100.56.5 (Serial0), len 60,
> > sending
> >
> > Notice how EIGRP is multicast over the non-neighbor
interfaces
> > and
unicast
>
> over the neighbor interface.
>
> >
> >
> > Now, side 2 with passive interface on serial 0:
> >
> > 10w1d: IP: s=155.100.56.5 (Serial0), d=224.0.0.10, len
60,
rcvd 2
> > 10w1d: IP: s=155.100.56.5 (Serial0), d=224.0.0.10, len
60,
rcvd 2
> > 10w1d: IP: s=155.100.6.6 (local), d=224.0.0.10 (Loopbac
k0),
len
> > 60,
sending broad/multicast
> >
> > It's receiving multicast hellos from 155.100.56.5, but
is
not
> > sending any
packets out that interface.
> >
> >
> > Conclusion:
> >
> > Neighbor causes the EIGRP packets to use unicast.
> >
> > Passive-interface works like OSPF and prevents hellos f
rom
being
> > propagated on the interface in question. THus, adjacen
cies
will
> > not
form.
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason Gardiner
> > Supervisor, Engineering Services
> > Sprint Internet Backbone Operations
> >
> > "You can swim all day in the Sea of Knowledge and
> > still come out completely dry. Most people do."
> >
> > Norton Juster
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Alex Paulino wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi all, how to configure the unicast neighbor over nb
ma
with
> > > Eigrp?
> > > I'm using:
> > >
> > > RA)
> > > router eigrp 30
> > > no auto-summary
> > > neighbor 10.1.1.2 interface serial 0.1
> > > passive-interface serial 0.1
> > >
> > > RB)
> > > router eigrp 30
> > > no auto-summary
> > > neighbor 10.1.1.1 interface serial 1.1
> > > passive-interface serial 1.1
> > >
> > > All Frame-relay maps are created, but the neighbor ne
ver
up.
> > >
> > > Thanks for help...
> > >
> > > alex
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:17 GMT-3