From: Sukhjit Singh (ssukhjit@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 12:39:54 GMT-3
Lupi,
You are right, prefix-list worked,
ip prefix-list 34 seq 5 deny 10.1.120.0/24
ip prefix-list 34 seq 15 permit 10.0.0.0/8 le 23
ip prefix-list 34 seq 20 permit 10.1.124.0/24
However still i am keen to know another way, if
possible using acl, Thanks,
Sukhs,
--- "Lupi, Guy" <Guy.Lupi@eurekaggn.com> wrote:
> I don't know what it would be as far as an extended
> access list, but you
> could use a "distribute-list prefix" to call a
> prefix list instead of an
> access list, that way you could define exactly what
> you want to be
> redistributed.
>
> ~-----Original Message-----
> ~From: Sukhjit Singh [mailto:ssukhjit@yahoo.com]
> ~Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:22 AM
> ~To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> ~Subject: ACL question
> ~
> ~
> ~ACL Experts,
> ~
> ~I have two routes in my R1 routing table,
> ~10.1.120.0 /24
> ~And 10.1.120.0 /22 (Summary route)
> ~
> ~I want to filter the /24 route & want to only pass
> /22
> ~summary route to other routers. I am using
> ~distribute-list command with route-map.
> ~
> ~It passes both of these routes, I am not sure what
> ~will be the right wildcard combination which can
> ~differnciate b/w these 2 routes.
> ~
> ~Any suggestions please,
> ~
> ~regards,
> ~Sukhs,
> ~
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:16 GMT-3