Static NAT for Public Servers

From: Albert Lu (albert_ccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 22 2002 - 00:32:09 GMT-3

• Next message: Steven Owen: "why does my dlsw circuit keep alive just one minute ?"
• Previous message: Sam.MicroGate@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: "RE: FLSM has longer mask than VLSM Probl."
• Next in thread: Church, Chuck: "RE: Static NAT for Public Servers"
• Maybe reply: Church, Chuck: "RE: Static NAT for Public Servers"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hello Group,

Are there any issues with utilising static NAT to translate publicly
routable addresses to private addresses for web servers and other publicly
accessable servers? The translation will be one-to-one static, so each
public address maps to a private address.

Will it be better to just have the servers have public addresses, rather
than have them behind a NAT?

Thanks in advance.

Albert

• Next message: Steven Owen: "why does my dlsw circuit keep alive just one minute ?"
• Previous message: Sam.MicroGate@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: "RE: FLSM has longer mask than VLSM Probl."
• Next in thread: Church, Chuck: "RE: Static NAT for Public Servers"
• Maybe reply: Church, Chuck: "RE: Static NAT for Public Servers"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:16 GMT-3