From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi (mamoor@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 17 2002 - 13:28:36 GMT-3
I guess ur lsap-OUTPUT-list says it all..... yes r1 will not be allowed but
r2 can when this list is put in dlsw remote peer statement.
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: Williams, Glenn <WILLIAMSG@PANASONIC.COM>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 5:28 PM
Subject: lsap-output-list
> Hi all,
>
> If there are two routers peering DLSW, R1 and R2 and a lsap-output-list is
> put on either one blocking a particular type of traffic like SNA for
> example, my question is does putting it on one side of either completely
> prevent SNA occurring between the two routers. In other words, it does
not
> have to be put on both, is this correct? So by putting it on one side, R1
> cannot get SNA data and R2 cannot get SNA data. However if the question
says
> no SNA traffic should be SENT from R1 to R2, then it is to be put on R1,
is
> that correct? I assume in this scenario, R2 can still send requests for
SNA
> to R1, but will not be able to receive from R1. Just want to be sure.
>
> TIA
> GW
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:12 GMT-3