Re: Can't bring subinterface up in Frame Lab

From: Jeffery S Kimes (kimes@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 14 2002 - 19:44:44 GMT-3

Next message: ying chang: "secondary address no longer works?"
Previous message: Erick B.: "Re: Can't bring subinterface up in Frame Lab"
Maybe in reply to: Bill Mckenzie: "Can't bring subinterface up in Frame Lab"
Next in thread: kris.keen@xxxxxxxxxx: "Re: Can't bring subinterface up in Frame Lab"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I think that the serial interfaces come up in an up/up state. Then when it
realizes that it isn't receiving protocol (keepalives) it shuts the
interface.
I would check to ensure that frame-relay encapsulation is set.
I would check to see whether you need to provide a clockrate for the
interface (DCE).
I might verify that LMI is the same on both ends.

I've even had a similar issue when I fat fingered the IP address (same IP
address on both ends of the circuit... :)

"Bill Mckenzie"

<bmckenzie@hotmai To: ccielab@groupstudy.com

l.com> cc:

Sent by: Subject: Can't bring subinterfa
ce up in Frame Lab
nobody@groupstudy

.com

04/14/2002 03:11

Please respond to

"Bill Mckenzie"

I am having trouble bringing a subinterface to up/up state. This is a spoke

router and if I do a no shut, the interface will come up for a moment and
go
right back down again.

Any help?

Thanks,
Bill Mckenzie

Next message: ying chang: "secondary address no longer works?"
Previous message: Erick B.: "Re: Can't bring subinterface up in Frame Lab"
Maybe in reply to: Bill Mckenzie: "Can't bring subinterface up in Frame Lab"
Next in thread: kris.keen@xxxxxxxxxx: "Re: Can't bring subinterface up in Frame Lab"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:08 GMT-3