From: Mas Kato (loomis_towcar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Apr 13 2002 - 22:57:57 GMT-3
[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text]
Try 'clear ip ospf process.' Not a complete substitute for a reload in all case
s, but still could be useful.
Regards,
Mas Kato
https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
>Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 20:46:14 -0400
> Bruce Williams <bruce@williamsnetworking.com> RE: router-id - quick question
Ryaboy Vadim <VRyaboy@acuson.com>Cc: "Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com" <ccielab@groups
tudy.com>
>Reply-To: Bruce Williams <bruce@williamsnetworking.com>
>
>That is what I do in all my practice labs and also what I intend to do on
>the actual lab. I dont believe that there is a problem with that, let me
>know if you hear that there is. By the way, is there a more graceful way of
>restarting the OSPF process other than "no ip ospf 1"?
>
>Bruce
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Ryaboy Vadim
>Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 7:29 PM
>To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
>Subject: router-id - quick question
>
>
> Hello,
>Is it legal on the lab to assign router id to the router ?
>For example, if router 3 is using ospf and virtual link is involved - as a
>good practice use command router-id 3.3.3.3 (assuming that is no ip network
>3.x.x.x anywhere on the network). Of course, I will restart opsf process,
>but looks like IOS even prompting me for it.
> Any strong opinion against that practice?
>Thank you.
>Vadim.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:07 GMT-3