From: Chuck Mason (romason0916@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Apr 13 2002 - 23:19:18 GMT-3
An additional note about the router-id.
I just forgot to nail the router-id to the x.x.1.1 or
x.x.2.2 loopback as I generally do. I have a couple of
other loopbacks configured to simulate interfaces that
I do not have on the router. Here is the message the
router returned. I think this is relatively a
relatively new enhancement.
01:34:10: %OSPF-3-RECONF_VL: OSPF process 10 is
changing router-id. Reconfigure
virtual link neighbors with our new router-id
I am running:
System returned to ROM by power-on
System image file is
"flash:c1700-bnr2sy-mz.121-5.T9.bin"
cisco 1750 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x501) with
27853K/4915K bytes of memory
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Ryaboy Vadim
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 8:29 AM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: router-id - quick question
Hello,
Is it legal on the lab to assign router id to the
router ?
For example, if router 3 is using ospf and virtual link
is involved - as a
good practice use command router-id 3.3.3.3 (assuming
that is no ip network
3.x.x.x anywhere on the network). Of course, I will
restart opsf process,
but looks like IOS even prompting me for it.
Any strong opinion against that practice?
Thank you.
Vadim.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:07 GMT-3