From: Chuck Mason (romason0916@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Apr 13 2002 - 22:48:47 GMT-3
I think it is good general practice to use loopbacks --
realworld and lab.
Try "clear ip ospf process" for restarting your ospf. A
command you will use if you forget to nail your
router-id and have 2 loops -- one with a higher id than
your "regular loopback".
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Bruce Williams
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Ryaboy Vadim
Cc: Ccielab@Groupstudy. Com
Subject: RE: router-id - quick question
That is what I do in all my practice labs and also what
I intend to do on
the actual lab. I dont believe that there is a problem
with that, let me
know if you hear that there is. By the way, is there a
more graceful way of
restarting the OSPF process other than "no ip ospf 1"?
Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Ryaboy Vadim
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 7:29 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: router-id - quick question
Hello,
Is it legal on the lab to assign router id to the
router ?
For example, if router 3 is using ospf and virtual link
is involved - as a
good practice use command router-id 3.3.3.3 (assuming
that is no ip network
3.x.x.x anywhere on the network). Of course, I will
restart opsf process,
but looks like IOS even prompting me for it.
Any strong opinion against that practice?
Thank you.
Vadim.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:07 GMT-3