From: Jeongwoo Park (jpark@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Apr 13 2002 - 15:10:04 GMT-3
Engelhard,
Are you saying that nothing would work under FR subinterfaces( ptp, multi)
whether it is direct encap or llc2? This is the impression I get from my
numerous trials.
I got the same error when I try to input frame map llc2 dlci#
Anyone wants to disagree?
JP
-----Original Message-----
From: Engelhard M. Labiro [mailto:engelhard@netmarks.co.jp]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 1:09 AM
To: Geoffrey KIM; Jeongwoo Park
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: DSLW direct encap --Peer disconnected--Drives me crazy.
Geoffrey,
I meant to say that frame interface point-to-point will not
accept "frame map llc2 DLCI" command. The following is an error
that I get, when type it in a point-to-point interface mode:
r1(config)#int s0/0.1
r1(config-subif)#frame-relay map llc2 102 broad
FRAME-RELAY INTERFACE-DLCI command should be used on point-to-point
interfaces
r1(config-subif)#
This means that this interface only need a
"frame-relay interface-dlci blah" command, and it will recognize
its remote DLSw peer as LLC2 type DLSw peer.
Regarding "pass-thru" and its related command "frame map dlsw"
I am sure this is only work on frame-relay physical interface and
won`t work on point-to-point or multipoint frame-relay interface.
See the archive, this was discussed before.
Engelhard M. Labiro$B!!(J(engelhard@netmarks.co.jp)
Security Group, Technical Solution Center, Netmarks Inc.
2-13-34 Konan, Minato-Ku, Tokyo 108-0075
Tel: +81-3-5461-2575, Fax: +81-3-5461-2093
----- Original Message -----
From: "Geoffrey KIM" <Geoffrey.KIM@iname.com>
To: "Engelhard M. Labiro" <engelhard@netmarks.co.jp>; "Jeongwoo Park"
<jpark@wams.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 4:35 PM
Subject: RE: DSLW direct encap --Peer disconnected--Drives me crazy.
> Engelhard,
>
> Any supporting doco on that? I can make the LLC2 work on all
> combinations of FR interface types, but I am not able to make the DLSw
> direct encap with 'pass-thru' work... on any combination of FR
> interfaces including phy-phy.
>
> Does anyone have a more definitive answer for this?
>
> Thanks,
> Geoffrey
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On
> > Behalf Of Engelhard M. Labiro
> > Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 4:14 PM
> > To: Jeongwoo Park; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: DSLW direct encap --Peer disconnected--Drives me crazy.
> >
> >
> > Hi Park,
> >
> > Your scenario as follow: Frame Relay point-to-point between
> > HQ and Branch router.
> >
> > With this scenario, DLSw direct encap using "frame-relay
> > map llc2" command can not be configured under point-to-point
> > interface configuration mode.
> > Last time when I tried this scenario, the peer will automatically
> > detects its remote-peer and connect as LLC (DLSw+ Lite)
> > peer.
> >
> > One thing that we have to remember, DLSw direct encap
> > "frame-relay map dlsw" ( pass-thru ) will never
> > work under point-to-point or multipoint interface .
> > "frame-relay map dlsw" will only work on physical Frame-Relay
> > interface.
> >
> >
> > Engelhard M. Labiro (engelhard@netmarks.co.jp)
> > Security Group, Technical Solution Center, Netmarks Inc.
> > 2-13-34 Konan, Minato-Ku, Tokyo 108-0075
> > Tel: +81-3-5461-2575, Fax: +81-3-5461-2093
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeongwoo Park" <jpark@wams.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 3:02 PM
> > Subject: DSLW direct encap --Peer disconnected--Drives me crazy.
> >
> >
> > > Ok DLSW gurus.
> > > DLSW over frame relay is not working.
> > > I saw your discussions on posts.
> > > I couldn't decide which way was correct way because too many
> > > conflict opinions against each other and cisco doc were there
> > > So, I tested it out myself. I couldn't get it to work. I
> > tried different
> > > kinds of combination, such as with pass-thru, w/o pass-thru, with
> > > frame-map dlsw and with frame-relay llce. No luck, so I am asking
> > > your help.
> > >
> > > I had TCP encap over FR working, but no luck on direct encap nor
> > > on dlsw lite.
> > > ether-router---------------------------------router-ether
> > > frame-relay
> > > Take a look at my config.
> > >
> > > What am I missing.
> > >
> > >
> > > hostname HQ
> > > !
> > > logging buffered 99999 debugging
> > > enable secret 5 $1$y2he$lnUO
> > > enable password xxxx
> > > !
> > > clock timezone PST -8
> > > ip subnet-zero
> > > no ip domain-lookup
> > > !
> > > !dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1
> > > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0 110
> > > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > > !
> > > interface Loopback0
> > > ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
> > > !
> > > interface FastEthernet0/0
> > > ip address 192.22.22.254 255.255.255.0
> > > speed 100
> > > full-duplex
> > > bridge-group 1
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0/0
> > > no ip address
> > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > no fair-queue
> > > service-module t1 timeslots 1-8
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0/0.110 point-to-point
> > > description Connection to Salinas_New
> > > ip address 10.0.5.1 255.255.255.252
> > > no arp frame-relay
> > > frame-relay interface-dlci 110
> > > !
> > > !
> > > bridge 1 protocol ieee
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > hostname Branch
> > > !
> > > logging buffered 4096 debugging
> > > enable password 7 06110
> > > !
> > > memory-size iomem 25
> > > ip subnet-zero
> > > no ip finger
> > > no ip domain-lookup
> > > !
> > > dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.0.5.2
> > > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0 100
> > > !
> > > !
> > > !
> > > interface FastEthernet0/0
> > > ip address 10.100.5.2 255.255.255.0
> > > duplex auto
> > > speed auto
> > > bridge-group 1
> > > !
> > > interface Serial0/0
> > > ip address 10.0.5.2 255.255.255.252
> > > encapsulation frame-relay
> > > no fair-queue
> > > service-module t1 timeslots 1-8
> > > frame-relay interface-dlci 100
> > > !
> > > !
> > > ip classless
> > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.5.1
> > > no ip http server
> > > !
> > > bridge 1 protocol ieee
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:07 GMT-3