From: Tarek Sabry (tsabry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 10 2002 - 16:09:51 GMT-3
Jack
Not quite sure why you want a second dial tone. Normally you would use DID
to eliminate an intermediary dialtone (ie have the router dial the extension
for you).
What exactly are you intending to do?
Regards
Tarek
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Jack S
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:54 PM
To: Sudhanshu Gupta; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Voice: Direct-inward-dial
Hi Sudhanshu,
Looks like DID applies to FXO port only. This solves
part of the problem.
Any idea how to get the second dial-tone?
Thanks,
Jack
--- Sudhanshu Gupta <sudhanshu.gupta@wipro.co.in>
wrote:
> Jack, check this out.
>
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/788/voip/direct_inward_dial.html
>
> Hope this helps.
> -sudhanshu
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jack S [SMTP:prospectccie@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:25 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Voice: Direct-inward-dial
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I couldn't figure out the functionality of
> > Direct-inward-dial. Once I configure it on the
> > incoming pots dial-peer, I am not even getting a
> > dial-tone. Can anyone throw some light on the
> > functionality of this command?
> >
> > I thought this command is required for 2-stage
> dialing
> > (getting a second dial-tone). Is my understanding
> > correct. If so, can anyonle please tell me how to
> get
> > thsi working?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jack
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:04 GMT-3