Q. Redistribution from EIGRP to RIP

From: donny.mateo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed Apr 10 2002 - 05:26:46 GMT-3


   
Dear All,

I was reading Solie's book CCIE practical studies.
on the chapter concerning RIP there is a sample of redistribution between RIP
and EIGRP ( Figure 9.4 page 622)
it says that if we were to redistribute route which is not having the same
subnet mask from EIGRP to RIP, it wouln't show in the routing table of RIP. It
puzzle me as to what is the reason behind this behaviour ?
The diagram is something like

E0/0-ip:128.200.1.2/24 rtr1 ---E0/1 IP:128.200.3.18/29 ---------
E0-IP:128.200.3.17/29 rtr2

rtr1 won't have network 128.200.3.0/29 in it's routing table.

thanks
Donny

(c) 2001 Credit Agricole Indosuez. All rights reserved. This message is
for information purposes only and its content should not be construed as an
offer, or solicitation of an offer, to buy or sell any banking or financial
instruments or services and no representation of warranty is given in
respect of its accuracy, completeness or fairness. The material is subject
to change without notice. We may use the material or the information on
which it is based prior to its dissemination. We may have a long or short
position in, make a sale or purchase of, offer to make a sale or purchase
of, make a market in or have underwritten, any of the banking or financial
instruments mentioned in this message or, where applicable, any securities
or issuers underlying such banking or financial instruments. You should
take your own independent tax, legal and other professional advice in
respect of the content of this message. This message may not be copied,
redistributed or published (in whole or in part) without our prior written
consent. This email may have been intercepted, partially destroyed, arrive
late, incomplete or contain viruses and no liablility is accepted as a
result. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please
immediately notify the sender and delete this message from your computer.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:03 GMT-3