From: sameer shah (sameer_ccie@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 10 2002 - 04:33:33 GMT-3
To block networks getting advertise in EIGRP from any other routing process,
You should use distribute-list under "router eigrp 100" process
Refer following link for more information on practical usage of
"distribute-list"
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/cs001.htm
Regards
Sameer
----- Original Message -----
From: Larson, Chris (Contractor) <Chris.Larson@ed.gov>
To: 'Frank B' <frank@buff-net.com>; 'Ali' <muali_cisco@hotmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 5:55 PM
Subject: RE: Q. eigrp/igrp red
> This type of confusion is why I never use distribute lists for
> redistribution. I would not propose to tell you that something is better
> then what you are doing especially if you are comfortable with it.
However,
> for me using route-maps when redsitributing is much easier. It removes the
> confusion I was having at times on when to use the distribute list in or
out
> command during redistribution. Route-maps are much easier to follow in my
> opinion.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank B [mailto:frank@buff-net.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 8:02 PM
> To: 'Ali'
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Q. eigrp/igrp red
>
>
> Ali,
> I believe you're current config blocks those networks cited in
> access-list 14 from coming "out of" EIGRP into IGRP. Since they exist
> only in the rip & igrp domains the command should have no effect.
>
> You should place the distribute-list statement under the EIGRP
> process and remember to read it as distribute-list 14 "out of" igrp 10.
>
>
> I don't have time to verify this but I believe that's how the
> "distribute-list out" command works. Let me know what you come up with.
>
> Frank
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Ali
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 12:03 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Q. eigrp/igrp red
>
> Guys;
> I am trying to block two network from being advertised to eigrp from
> igrp.
> What am i doing wrong here?
>
> R7
> / \
> rip / \ igrp10
> / \
> R3 ------ R4
> eigrp10
>
>
> 195.1.1.0 & 195.1.2.0 are directly connected to R3 and advertised via
> RIP. R7
> is doing mutual red bet RIP/IGRP10.
>
> R4
> !
> router eigrp 10
> passive-interface Serial0
> network 150.100.0.0
> default-metric 10000 100 255 100 1500
> no auto-summary
> no eigrp log-neighbor-changes
> !
> router igrp 10
> redistribute connected
> passive-interface Ethernet0
> network 172.16.0.0
> default-metric 10000 100 255 100 1500
> distribute-list 14 out eigrp 10
> !
> access-list 14 deny 195.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
> access-list 14 deny 195.1.2.0 0.0.0.255
> access-list 14 permit any
> !
>
> TIA
> /Ali
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:03 GMT-3