From: Gregg Malcolm (greggm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Apr 10 2002 - 01:40:50 GMT-3
I've been reading this thread and in thinking about all of the responses,
I've come to the following conclusion. It makes me think of the written
test and how the questions were worded. The technology was never the hard
part for me (I've passed the written twice). The only time I failed was
when I overanalyzed the questions. If you saw a question on the written
that asked for the command to ensure that a switch never becomes root, Tim's
answer makes complete sense. I believe that if everyone thinks back to some
of the questions on the written test, they'll remember some other similarly
worded questions.
Seems to me that a good strategy for the lab is to apply the same type of
thinking that is required on the written. After all, both tests are made by
the same company (and very likely the same people). Try to use the same
logic that is allowing you to take the lab test.
Just my opinion, Gregg
----- Original Message -----
From: "Manny Gonzalez" <manny@nyp.org>
To: "Raymond Gan" <ray_gan74@hotmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: Lab Tomorrow! Need Help
> I disagree. I passed as well and I know I am wrong on a lot of things a
> lot. The more you learn the more you know how little you know. Besides,
> we "humans" do make mistakes a lot.
>
> We simply have gone the extra mile and have been very fortunate to have
> learned enough to pass the CCIE Lab. However, that does not make us
> infallible.
>
> :-))
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:58:03 GMT-3