From: Bob Sinclair (bsin@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 07 2002 - 19:04:05 GMT-3
Larry,
I would suggest making the bridge priority 65535, the highest possible value.
Good luck!
-Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Whitfill" <whitfill@cox.net>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 5:43 PM
Subject: Lab Tomorrow! Need Help
> Hello fellow CCIE waqnnabes and accomplished CCIEs!
>
> I'm sittingin my hotel 13 hours from ground zero and needed some
> clarification and help.
>
> 1. When one wants to ensure that his switch does not become root under any
> circumstance does he set the bridge priority to 0, does he set the priority
> to the highest possible value, or does he do someting entirely different.
> This has been kicked around quite a bit, but I never found a difinitive
> answer here or on CCO, books, etc., and don't have two CATs to test.
>
> 2. When using DLSW+ peer-on-demand, do I also have to configure a border
> peer, use the promiscuous keyword, both or neither?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Larry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:59 GMT-3