From: Greg Parrish (gparrish@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Apr 07 2002 - 10:37:25 GMT-3
David SAP is not responsible for EIGRP at all. The tie in there is that when r
unning IPX routing using EIGRP
and not RIP you get the benefit of SAPs not being flooded every 60 seconds. Th
is is used almost entirely in
the WAN enviromnet normally and very good for those low speed frame relay links
. When you use this it is a
good idea to also turn off RIP for the WAN network also. Here is you page in no
n PDF format also, not sure why
you want to view PDFs for this.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/atipx_c
/ipx/2cdipx.htm
Thanks,
Greg
"David Lee Steele, Jr." wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot to include the link to which I was referring.
>
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/
> atipx_c/ipx/2cdipx.pdf
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Lee Steele, Jr. [mailto:d.steele2@comcast.net]
> Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 11:12 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: IPX, EIGRP, SAP
>
>
>
> When reading the page at the following link (specifically the section on
> controlling SAP updates), I am a bit confused about what SAP has to do
> with EIGRP. I understand that SAP is used to advertise file servers and
> possibly other things?), so is Service Advertising Protocol used to
> advertise the existence of a EIGRP router?
>
>
>
> Any clarification on this would be helpful.
>
>
>
> David Lee Steele, Jr.
>
> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature w
hich had a name of smime.p7s]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:58 GMT-3