From: Tarek Sabry (tsabry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Apr 02 2002 - 22:10:23 GMT-3
I agree. Or I guess you can make the peer a passive one too.
Tarek
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Bob Sinclair
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:00 PM
To: Carl Phelan
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: DLSW Backup Peers
Carl,
Have you made the backup peer promiscuous? If 133.10.3.3 has a peer
statement back to this one, the connection will stay up.
-Bob
<carlphelan@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:21 PM
Subject: DLSW Backup Peers
> Hi All,
>
> I have configured a DLSW backup peer as follows:
>
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 133.10.2.2
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 133.10.3.3 backup-peer 133.10.2.2
>
> The thing is the router connects to both peers simultaneously rather
> than remain disconnected from 133.10.3.3 until 133.10.2.2 becomes
> unavailable as expected.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:52 GMT-3