From: John Neiberger (neiby@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Apr 02 2002 - 17:05:38 GMT-3
I thought I understood this but I've been
browsing the archives and a few times I've
seen the exact opposite of what I thought.
Please verify my thinking and point out the
error in my logic if there is one. I'm
going to be checking CCO, of course, but I
wanted to get your opinions, as well.
If we're using Dlsw+ with direct
encapsulation on frame relay *without*
pass-thru, we're passing dlsw frames across
the cloud, NOT llc2. LLC2 is locally
acknowledged and we need to use 'frame relay
map dlsw a.b.c.d' at the interface level.
If we decide to use the pass-thru method,
then llc2 traffic is no longer being locally
acknowledged. To allow the traffic to
traverse the frame cloud we need to use
'frame map llc2 a.b.c.d'.
The examples I found in the archives state
the exact opposite which makes no sense to
me at all. Without pass-thru, I just don't
see why we would map llc2 to a PVC if the
llc2 frames aren't being passed thru!
I hate it when I think I understand
something and then it turns out I don't.
:-)
Thanks,
John
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:52 GMT-3