From: Jim Newton (jnewton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Apr 01 2002 - 13:29:00 GMT-3
Do you have the same endpoint and source for the tunnels?
I read something on CCO a couple weeks ago that I can't find right now about
having two tunnels between the same routers using the same source and
endpoint and how IGRP would only accept updates from one of them. I will
keep looking for the page, but if I remember the information right this
might be your problem.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Ahmed
Mamoor Amimi
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Jack S; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Using tunnels between IGRP neighbors
R2 will never ever learn this route as it connected network have more
specific network. as this is a FLSM protcol so it
will not entertain that route.
Please have a look how FLSM protcols works :
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/54.html
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack S <prospectccie@yahoo.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 6:22 AM
Subject: Using tunnels between IGRP neighbors
> Hi All,
>
> Can I use two tunnels to ship routing updates of
> differnt subnets between 2 IGRP peers?
>
> Here is my setup:
>
> 130.12.128.0/20
> 130.12.10..0/24
> R1 --------------------R2
> 130.12.1.0 /28
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:51 GMT-3