From: Lupi, Guy (Guy.Lupi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Mar 31 2002 - 12:03:44 GMT-3
I see your logic, but I have never had to use the encapsulation ppp command
on the bri interface regardless of whether it was for inbound or outbound
calls. I am in the lab right now and I have it set up, it is working fine
without the encapsulation on the physical interface. The bri interface
shows hdlc encapsulation, but the b channels and dialer interface show ppp.
I also have a host route on both the incoming and outgoing routers, which
would indicate to me that they are actually running ppp.
~-----Original Message-----
~From: Ronny Jonathan [mailto:rjonathan@yahoo.com]
~Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 9:42 AM
~To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
~Subject: Re: ISDN question
~
~
~The ppp encap on the BRI (physical interface) is needed when
~the your dialer interface was configured for incoming call.
~
~When there is an incoming call, the physical interface will receive
~the call before the call can be associated with the dialer interface.
~
~If your dialer interfaces were only for outgoing calls, you need not
~configured ppp encap on the physical (BRI) interface.
~
~Regards,
~Ronny
~----- Original Message -----
~From: "Lupi, Guy" <Guy.Lupi@eurekaggn.com>
~To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
~Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 8:53 PM
~Subject: ISDN question
~
~
~> I have noticed in certain sample configs on CCO that when
~using dialer
~> interfaces, ppp encapsulation is specified on both the BRI and on the
~dialer
~> interface. I have found that I don't need to have it on the BRI
~interface,
~> at least not in any of the configs that I have done. Does
~anyone know if
~it
~> is required to have the ppp encap specified on the BRI in certain
~situations
~> when using dialer interfaces? Thanks.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:27 GMT-3