From: Lab Candidate (labccie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Mar 26 2002 - 15:31:19 GMT-3
Ray,
In what situations, the connected interfaces that are covered by the routing pr
ocess' network
statement are not redistributed, and you have to use redistribute connected to
get it propagated?
------ Nigel Roy <nigel@system-link.co.uk> wrote: > Ray, > > Yes you are quite correct, however if you are going into OSPF unless you > have the whole network assigned to one interface you will need the subnets > keyword!! > > regards > > Nigel > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ray" <ray.armstrong@data-evolution.net> > To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:27 AM > Subject: default behaviour - redistribution of IGRP into OSPF and connected > networks, sanity check ? > > > > Hi, > > > > Could anyone please enlighten me here. > > > > If you have a connected network say 172.16.0.0, and this is covered by a > > network statement in IGRP. If you redistribute from IGRP into say OSPF, > > would you not expect the 172.16.0.0 network to be propagated around the > OSPF > > network ? > > > > I was under the impression that a connected network would be redistributed > > if it came under the boundary of a network statement, and those connected > > net's who don't, have to be manually redistributed by redistribute > connected > > ? > > > > any takers, > > > > TIA. > > > > RA. > > > > [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which > had a name of winmail.dat]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:22 GMT-3