From: Nigel Roy (nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Mar 26 2002 - 08:29:49 GMT-3
Ray,
Yes you are quite correct, however if you are going into OSPF unless you
have the whole network assigned to one interface you will need the subnets
keyword!!
regards
Nigel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ray" <ray.armstrong@data-evolution.net>
To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:27 AM
Subject: default behaviour - redistribution of IGRP into OSPF and connected
networks, sanity check ?
> Hi,
>
> Could anyone please enlighten me here.
>
> If you have a connected network say 172.16.0.0, and this is covered by a
> network statement in IGRP. If you redistribute from IGRP into say OSPF,
> would you not expect the 172.16.0.0 network to be propagated around the
OSPF
> network ?
>
> I was under the impression that a connected network would be redistributed
> if it came under the boundary of a network statement, and those connected
> net's who don't, have to be manually redistributed by redistribute
connected
> ?
>
> any takers,
>
> TIA.
>
> RA.
>
> [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which
had a name of winmail.dat]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:22 GMT-3