From: Carl Phelan (carlphelan@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 21 2002 - 15:19:15 GMT-3
Hi,
I removed the 'dial-peer voice 111 voip' statement as well with no luck.
I am wondering if it could be an issue simply with the adaptors that I
am using. Being based in the UK, the phone connections are not RJ-11
and must be converted with an adaptor - it's probably not relevant.
The thing is I get a dial tone on both lines and the same port lights up
when either handset is lifted showing that both phones are logically
connected to one port but physically connected to separate ports - if I
swap ports on the router, only one line has a dial tone and the other
goes dead. I may have to buy another adaptor if I cannot find another
possible solution.
Many thanks again for your advice on all this.
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Glenn [mailto:WILLIAMSG@PANASONIC.COM]
Sent: 21 March 2002 17:46
To: 'Carl Phelan'; 'Tshon'
Cc: 'DAN DORTON'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Basic Voice
like someone said you need to delete the "dial-peer voice 111 voip"
its messing things up.
GW
-----Original Message-----
From: Carl Phelan [mailto:carlphelan@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:28 AM
To: 'Tshon'
Cc: 'DAN DORTON'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Basic Voice
Config as requested, thanks again.
version 12.1
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
hostname BB2
!
!
!
!
!
!
memory-size iomem 15
ip subnet-zero
!
ip audit notify log
ip audit po max-events 100
lane client flush
!
!
!
!
!
voice-port 1/0/0
!
voice-port 1/0/1
!
voice-port 1/1/0
cptone IE
!
voice-port 1/1/1
cptone IE
!
!
dial-peer voice 1 pots
destination-pattern 911
port 1/1/0
!
dial-peer voice 2 pots
destination-pattern 922
port 1/1/1
!
dial-peer voice 111 voip
destination-pattern 911
session target ipv4:192.168.0.217
!
!
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 35.0.0.1 255.255.255.255
!
interface Ethernet0/0
ip address 192.168.0.217 255.255.255.0
!
router bgp 254
!
ip classless
no ip http server
!
!
line con 0
exec-timeout 0 0
transport input none
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
login
!
no scheduler allocate
end
-----Original Message-----
From: Tshon [mailto:tshon@netzero.net]
Sent: 21 March 2002 17:17
To: Carl Phelan
Cc: 'DAN DORTON'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Basic Voice
Post your entire config, and we can help you out.
Carl Phelan wrote:
I should be able to dial 911 but I can't hence problem. Thanks for your
advice - both ports seem to think they are on the same port, when I lift
the hand set on either, he green light appears on port 1/1/1 for both
yet they are physically attached to different ports. It's a strange
one!
-----Original Message-----
From: DAN DORTON [mailto:DHSTS68@dhs.state.il.us]
Sent: 21 March 2002 15:08
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; carlphelan@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Basic Voice
If the call is local to the router you don't need the dial-peer voip.
With your dial-peer pots configuration you should be able to dial 911 to
get the phone on port 1/1/0 from the phone on port 1/1/1 & vice versa.
"Carl Phelan" <mailto:carlphelan@hotmail.com> <carlphelan@hotmail.com>
03/21/02 07:32AM >>>
Hi All,
Does anyone have a basic configuration to test voice on the same router
i.e. ring another phone attached to the other fxs port. I have 2 fxs
ports, 1/1/0 and 1/1/1 and I have used the following configuration:
dial-peer voice 1 pots
destination-pattern 911
port 1/1/0
!
dial-peer voice 2 pots
destination-pattern 922
port 1/1/1
!
I have added a session target command although this may not be needed as
ports are local - or is that the case?:
dial-peer voice 111 voip
destination-pattern 911
session target ipv4:35.0.0.1
!
!
!
interface Loopback0
ip address 35.0.0.1 255.255.255.255
It appears both phones are attached logically to the same port 1/1/1,
dialling 922 brings up an engaged tone on both and 911 rings out. Is it
possible in the first place to test voice this way?
Many thanks for your advice.
Carl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:16 GMT-3