From: Tshon (tshon@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 21 2002 - 14:16:59 GMT-3
Post your entire config, and we can help you out.
Carl Phelan wrote:
>I should be able to dial 911 but I can't hence problem. Thanks for your
>advice - both ports seem to think they are on the same port, when I lift
>the hand set on either, he green light appears on port 1/1/1 for both
>yet they are physically attached to different ports. It's a strange
>one!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: DAN DORTON [mailto:DHSTS68@dhs.state.il.us]
>Sent: 21 March 2002 15:08
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; carlphelan@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: Basic Voice
>
>If the call is local to the router you don't need the dial-peer voip.
>
>With your dial-peer pots configuration you should be able to dial 911 to
>get the phone on port 1/1/0 from the phone on port 1/1/1 & vice versa.
>
>>>>"Carl Phelan" <carlphelan@hotmail.com> 03/21/02 07:32AM >>>
>>>>
>Hi All,
>
>Does anyone have a basic configuration to test voice on the same router
>i.e. ring another phone attached to the other fxs port. I have 2 fxs
>ports, 1/1/0 and 1/1/1 and I have used the following configuration:
>
>dial-peer voice 1 pots
> destination-pattern 911
> port 1/1/0
>!
>dial-peer voice 2 pots
> destination-pattern 922
> port 1/1/1
>!
>
>I have added a session target command although this may not be needed as
>ports are local - or is that the case?:
>
>dial-peer voice 111 voip
> destination-pattern 911
> session target ipv4:35.0.0.1
>!
>!
>!
>interface Loopback0
> ip address 35.0.0.1 255.255.255.255
>
>
>It appears both phones are attached logically to the same port 1/1/1,
>dialling 922 brings up an engaged tone on both and 911 rings out. Is it
>possible in the first place to test voice this way?
>
>Many thanks for your advice.
>
>Carl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:16 GMT-3