From: DAN DORTON (DHSTS68@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Mar 21 2002 - 12:02:10 GMT-3
That did it.
I couldn't find any samples that had anything, but either async default routing
, or async dynamic routing.
Put in both & it works like a charm!
Thanks
>>> "Ahmed Mamoor Amimi" <mamoor@ieee.org> 03/21/02 12:42AM >>>
also use a command:
async default routing
also paste ur config for detail
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: DAN DORTON <DHSTS68@dhs.state.il.us>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:16 AM
Subject: Dynamic routing over aux.
> I was playing with two aux ports directly connecting to each other via a
rollover cable & I was only able to make it route over them with statics.
>
> I looked under the documentation & it says "To enable manually configured
routing on an asynchronous interface, use the async dynamic routing
interface configuration command. Use the no form of this command to disable
routing protocols; static routing is still used.".
>
> The "static routing is still used" part is what caught my eye.
>
> I noticed with RIP is would never try to send anything over the async
interface & with OSPF under show ip ospf int is said "No Hellos (Passive
interface)".
>
> I tried all the routing protocols to no avail.
>
> Unfortunately the only way I could get a dynamic protocol to go across it
was with a tunnel interface.
>
> Worked fine this way.
>
> Is this normal operation for aux based async interfaces, or do I just have
code issues?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:16 GMT-3