Re: translational bridging driving be nuts!!!

From: Manny Gonzalez (gonzalu@xxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 18 2002 - 19:46:45 GMT-3


   
Yes, looks okay to me... but, I do not think the 5 in the global command
is related to the bridge on the interface. The 5 is simply a jump bridge
from the pseudo, to the transparent bridge. It need not be the same as
the bridge from the Token Ring ring to the virtual ring.

"Narvaez, Pablo" wrote:
>
> Please correct if I'm wrong:
>
> ** TLB only, no SRB **
>
> int ethernet0
> bridge-group 1
>
> int token0
> bridge-group 1
>
> bridge 1 protocolo ieee
> bridge 1 bitswap-layer3-addresses
>
> ** SR/TLB **
>
> source-bridge ring-group 100
> source-bridge transparent 100 1000 5 1
>
> int ethernet0
> bridge-group 1
>
> int token0
> source-route 10 5 100
> source-route spanning
>
> bridge 1 protocol ieee
>
> Summarizing, if doing TLB only I do need the bitswap-layer3-addresses command
. If doing SR/TLB I do NOT need
> the bitswap-layer3-addresses command .... is that correct ?
>
> Plus, is the source-bridge transparent statement correctly configured accordi
ng to the parameters I have in the interfaces?
>
> Cheers!!
>
> -hockito-
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Ingham [mailto:fningham@worldnet.att.net]
> Sent: Domingo, 03 de Marzo de 2002 04:27 p.m.
> To: Anand Ghody
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: translational bridging driving be nuts!!!
>
> Anard: My guess without configuring it is that the bit swapping is not
> working as you
> expect. Change the r4 token ring bridge to 1 and the SR/TRB statement
> to 100 3 1 1. Use debug arp on R1 and R4 to see that they are received
> on the respective routers.
>
> Multiring is not required for SRT.
>
> Let me know what happens.
> Cheers, Fred.
>
> Anand Ghody wrote:
> >
> > Alright, I have no idea why this is not working and need help. I
> > checked previous posts and made some adjustments but it still does not
> > work Need help!!!
> >
> > heres the setup
> >
> > r3 (e0, 172.16.3.2) -> catalyst 5505 port 2/2 -> catalyst 5505 port 2/1 ->
> > r4 (e0) -> r4 (to0) -> cat 3900 port 1 ->cat 3900 port 6 -> r1 (to0,
> > 172.16.3.1)
> >
> > I have disable ip routing on r4 and also setup bridge 1 bitswap-layer3
> > address
> >
> > the ports on the cataylst 5500 are on the same vlan
> > the port on the cataylst 3900 are also in the same vlan and setup for srt
> >
> > If I but an ip address on r4 token ring I can ping it from r1
> >
> > I'll past the configs to make it easier
> >
> > r3 config
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0
> > ip address 172.16.3.2 255.255.255.0
> >
> > |
> > connnects to catalyst 5500
> > |
> >
> > r4 config
> > no ip routing
> > no ip finger
> > !
> > !
> > source-bridge ring-group 100
> > source-bridge transparent 100 3 2 1
> > !
> > !
> > interface Ethernet0
> > no ip address
> > no ip route-cache
> > bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface Serial0
> > no ip address
> > no ip route-cache
> > shutdown
> > !
> > interface Serial1
> > no ip address
> > no ip route-cache
> > shutdown
> > !
> > interface TokenRing0
> > no ip address
> > no ip route-cache
> > ring-speed 16
> > source-bridge 1 2 100
> > !
> > ip classless
> > no ip http server
> > !
> > bridge 1 protocol ieee
> > bridge 1 bitswap-layer3-addresses
> > !
> >
> > |
> > connects to catalyst 3900
> > |
> >
> > r1 config
> > !
> > interface TokenRing0
> > ip address 172.16.3.1 255.255.255.0
> > ring-speed 16
> >
> >
> >
> > .



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:12 GMT-3