RE: translational bridging driving be nuts!!!

From: Jason Sinclair (sinclairj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Mar 18 2002 - 21:01:59 GMT-3


   
Hockito,

Your source-bridge transparent config is correct. Also you will need to
bitswap your layer 3 addresses regardless of how you do this.

Regards,

Jason Sinclair
Manager, Network Support Group
POWERTEL
Ground Level, 55 Clarence Street,
SYDNEY NSW 2000
AUSTRALIA
office: + 61 2 8264 3820
mobile: + 61 416 105 858
* sinclairj@powertel.com.au

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Narvaez, Pablo [mailto:Pablo.Narvaez@getronics.com]
                Sent: Tuesday, 19 March 2002 08:26
                To: Fred Ingham; Anand Ghody
                Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
                Subject: RE: translational bridging driving be
nuts!!!

                Please correct if I'm wrong:

                ** TLB only, no SRB **

                int ethernet0
                bridge-group 1

                int token0
                bridge-group 1

                bridge 1 protocolo ieee
                bridge 1 bitswap-layer3-addresses

                ** SR/TLB **

                source-bridge ring-group 100
                source-bridge transparent 100 1000 5 1

                int ethernet0
                bridge-group 1

                int token0
                source-route 10 5 100
                source-route spanning

                bridge 1 protocol ieee

                Summarizing, if doing TLB only I do need the
bitswap-layer3-addresses command. If doing SR/TLB I do NOT need
                the bitswap-layer3-addresses command .... is that correct ?

                Plus, is the source-bridge transparent statement correctly
configured according to the parameters I have in the interfaces?

                Cheers!!

                -hockito-

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Fred Ingham [mailto:fningham@worldnet.att.net]
                Sent: Domingo, 03 de Marzo de 2002 04:27 p.m.
                To: Anand Ghody
                Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
                Subject: Re: translational bridging driving be nuts!!!

                Anard: My guess without configuring it is that the bit
swapping is not
                working as you
                expect. Change the r4 token ring bridge to 1 and the SR/TRB
statement
                to 100 3 1 1. Use debug arp on R1 and R4 to see that they
are received
                on the respective routers.

                Multiring is not required for SRT.

                Let me know what happens.
                Cheers, Fred.

                Anand Ghody wrote:
>
> Alright, I have no idea why this is not working and need
help. I
> checked previous posts and made some adjustments but it
still does not
> work Need help!!!
>
> heres the setup
>
> r3 (e0, 172.16.3.2) -> catalyst 5505 port 2/2 -> catalyst
5505 port 2/1 ->
> r4 (e0) -> r4 (to0) -> cat 3900 port 1 ->cat 3900 port 6
-> r1 (to0,
> 172.16.3.1)
>
> I have disable ip routing on r4 and also setup bridge 1
bitswap-layer3
> address
>
> the ports on the cataylst 5500 are on the same vlan
> the port on the cataylst 3900 are also in the same vlan
and setup for srt
>
> If I but an ip address on r4 token ring I can ping it from
r1
>
> I'll past the configs to make it easier
>
> r3 config
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> ip address 172.16.3.2 255.255.255.0
>
> |
> connnects to catalyst 5500
> |
>
> r4 config
> no ip routing
> no ip finger
> !
> !
> source-bridge ring-group 100
> source-bridge transparent 100 3 2 1
> !
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> no ip address
> no ip route-cache
> bridge-group 1
> !
> interface Serial0
> no ip address
> no ip route-cache
> shutdown
> !
> interface Serial1
> no ip address
> no ip route-cache
> shutdown
> !
> interface TokenRing0
> no ip address
> no ip route-cache
> ring-speed 16
> source-bridge 1 2 100
> !
> ip classless
> no ip http server
> !
> bridge 1 protocol ieee
> bridge 1 bitswap-layer3-addresses
> !
>
> |
> connects to catalyst 3900
> |
>
> r1 config
> !
> interface TokenRing0
> ip address 172.16.3.1 255.255.255.0
> ring-speed 16
>
>
>
> .
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:12 GMT-3