From: Chua, Parry (Parry.Chua@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Mar 17 2002 - 22:45:16 GMT-3
I have problem in some of the routers(may be with some version of IOS) which fa
il to show
any thing on the new ospf database after redistribution. But OK after configure
with area 0.
For the recent tests, no area is needed on the new ospf process is needed. So,
test it your self.
Thanks for bring this up..
Parry Chua
-----Original Message-----
From: jonatale@earthlink.net [mailto:jonatale@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 6:52 AM
To: Chua, Parry
Cc: Leonardo Pereira; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Redistribute ospf1-> ospf2->rip
why is 1. a reguirement?
Chua, Parry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a couple of config problem in the orginal posting.
>
> 1. If you redistribute ospf1 to ospf2, the ospf 2 also must run with
> area 0.
> 2. If the redistribute network to RIP is on different classful address,
> a resultant classful network will be in RIP network.
>
> May be I miss out something.
>
> Regards
> Parry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leonardo Pereira [mailto:lpereira@br.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:06 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Redistribute ospf1-> ospf2->rip
>
> Hi Everybody !!!
>
> I was just listening until now, but now I resolved to give my 2 cents
> (like
> you guys say... :-D ).
> My lab is scheduled to February 19th and I was studying this yesterday.
> It
> seems to me that you are doing the summarization in a wrong way. You
> didnot
> send the ip address configured in your R2's Ethernet 0, but I am
> supposing
> that it is configured with a 24 bit mask because the other Ethernet 0 at
> R1. So, when you try to redistribute from ospf to rip you should
> summarize
> with a 24 bit mask and not 16 bit mask as you are doing.
>
> You can see a great explanation about this at:
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/54.html
>
> So the summary-address, IMHO, should be:
> summary-address 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0
>
> Try this and let us know if it works.
>
> Regards,
> Leonardo.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:11 GMT-3