From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi (mamoor@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Mar 13 2002 - 00:37:48 GMT-3
First of all troubleshoot from the local.....
some points :
- all the DLCI are given to main interface not to the sub, so u have to give
a MAP or frame interface-dlci.
- eigrp adjency are created as soon as the eigrp send the hello packet......
remeber .... that in ur childhood u have
learnt in CCNP that eigrp hellos are unreliable and form the adj as they
send the packet.
- check ur frame-relay map
- try to do a refresh on fram-inverse arp ....
-Now if all the points are ok then check if that
Most of the troubles are with layer 2 ...... upper layer are friendly.
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: John Neiberger <neiby@ureach.com>
To: Sundar Palaniappan <sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: Redistribute connected Question
> The only thing I can think of is that the ethernet interface
> wasn't up/up so it probably wasn't in the routing table of
> either router.
>
> Well, I just thought of one other thing. You don't have a
> default-metric set and I think EIGRP requires a default metric
> before redistribution will occur.
>
> Regards,
> John
>
> ---- On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Sundar Palaniappan
> (sundar_palaniappan@hotmail.com) wrote:
>
> > There are two routers running EIGRP in a hub-and-spoke
> topology with a
> > frame-relay connection between them.
> >
> >
> > Here is the configuration:
> >
> > Router A:
> >
> > interface serial0.2
> > ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.252
> >
> > router eigrp 200
> > network 192.168.10.0
> > no auto-summary
> >
> >
> > Router B:
> >
> > interface e0
> > ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.0.0
> >
> > interface serial0.1
> > ip address 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.252
> >
> > router eigrp 200
> > network 192.168.10.0 (serial0.1)
> > redistribute connected
> > no auto-summary
> >
> >
> >
> > EIGRP neighbor relationship is established. With this setup,
> I am
> > thinking I
> > should be able to ping the ethernet interface of Router B but
> I can't.
> >
> > I checked the route table on Router A and I don't see a route
> to
> > 172.16.0.0
> > subnet.
> >
> > When I removed "redistribute connected" and put the network
> statement
> > (172.16.0.0) under the EIGRP process on Router B and it WORKS.
> >
> > Just curious to know why "redistribute connected" doesn't
> work.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sundar
> >
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:02 GMT-3