From: kenairs (kenairs@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Mar 12 2002 - 14:15:52 GMT-3
Hi ,
So in others words, aparting from redistribute into IGP , RR will only works
if you have turn off syn.
Am i correct ?
Or is there any other way beside redistributing to IGP ?
----- Original Message -----
From: Sandro Ciffali <sandyccie@yahoo.com>
To: kenairs <kenairs@hotmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:38 AM
Subject: Re: BGP RR
> Since you have sync on, Network advertize by R2 on bgp
> will go into R1's routing table only if it is recd.
> both on BGP and IGP, Only then R1 will advertize that
> network to R3.
> If you turn off the sync on R1 then you will see it
> being advertized to R3.
> Or else redistribute the ethernet on R2 into your
> igrp.
>
> Sandro
> --- kenairs <kenairs@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi ,
> > From the Cisco CD , is states the below
> >
> > When the route reflector receives an advertised
> > route, depending on the
> > neighbor, it does the following:
> >
> >
> > a.. A route from an external BGP speaker is
> > advertised to all clients and
> > nonclient peers.
> >
> >
> > b.. A route from a nonclient peer is advertised to
> > all clients.
> >
> >
> > c.. A route from a client is advertised to all
> > clients and nonclient peers.
> > Hence, the clients need not be fully meshed.
> > Here is my topology,
> >
> > R1
> > | |
> > | |
> > | |
> > R2 R3
> >
> > All routers are able to reach each other through IGP
> > ( eigrp ) . R1 is the RR
> > R2 and R3 is the client.
> >
> > Now, R2 has a E0 . It then have a network command
> > under BGP and is propagrate
> > to R1.
> > But R1 does not advertised the route to R3 ..
> > Why is this so ?
> > All routers are syn enabled.
> >
> >
> > but is R2 received a route from another AS, the
> > route will be advertised to
> > R3.
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:57:01 GMT-3